<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We are Legion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/</link>
	<description>Energies of the Trinity © Perry C. Robinson 2004-2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:42:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Photios Jones</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Photios Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>It was an okay essay. I thought there were some real problems with it in some places. As I have time, I&#039;d like to generate discussion, but I can&#039;t at the moment. One quote that really jumped out at me was this from St. Leo clarifying his Tome after the Council: &quot;...the actions were of one Person all the time...but we perceive from the character of the acts what belongs to either form.&quot;

Can we say patristic &quot;ordo theologiae?&quot; Not a hint of &quot;Augustinism&quot; in that statement.

Photios</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was an okay essay. I thought there were some real problems with it in some places. As I have time, I&#8217;d like to generate discussion, but I can&#8217;t at the moment. One quote that really jumped out at me was this from St. Leo clarifying his Tome after the Council: &#8220;&#8230;the actions were of one Person all the time&#8230;but we perceive from the character of the acts what belongs to either form.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can we say patristic &#8220;ordo theologiae?&#8221; Not a hint of &#8220;Augustinism&#8221; in that statement.</p>
<p>Photios</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1579</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1579</guid>
		<description>Has anyone had a chance to plow through the paper that William referenced above?? I just finished it last night and would love to see a discussion of it.

Joseph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone had a chance to plow through the paper that William referenced above?? I just finished it last night and would love to see a discussion of it.</p>
<p>Joseph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>I also beg the response of the learned to my question at the bottom of the &quot;Directing the Course&quot; thread on Filioque, particularly about the SCOBA agreed statement with the Catholic theologians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also beg the response of the learned to my question at the bottom of the &#8220;Directing the Course&#8221; thread on Filioque, particularly about the SCOBA agreed statement with the Catholic theologians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neochalcedonian</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>neochalcedonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>I want your take on this essay I found online.  The thesis is extremely bold:

&quot;The purpose of this paper is to determine the logical meaning of the Chalcedonian Definition of the Faith and to show that the doctrine of the double procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father &quot;and the Son&quot; (Filioque) based upon the theory of psychological analogy is logically incompatible with it.&quot;

http://faculty.washington.edu/ewebb/ChTh&amp;Fil.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want your take on this essay I found online.  The thesis is extremely bold:</p>
<p>&#8220;The purpose of this paper is to determine the logical meaning of the Chalcedonian Definition of the Faith and to show that the doctrine of the double procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father &#8220;and the Son&#8221; (Filioque) based upon the theory of psychological analogy is logically incompatible with it.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://faculty.washington.edu/ewebb/ChTh&amp;Fil.html" rel="nofollow">http://faculty.washington.edu/ewebb/ChTh&amp;Fil.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophocles</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophocles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>Dear Energies Guys,

Uh, sorry to be a bugger, but a while back on &quot;When Being Catholic Isn&#039;t&quot; I asked you guys  a few questions(down towards the bottom). I&#039;m interested especially i the question about monasticism.

In fellopwship and in Christ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Energies Guys,</p>
<p>Uh, sorry to be a bugger, but a while back on &#8220;When Being Catholic Isn&#8217;t&#8221; I asked you guys  a few questions(down towards the bottom). I&#8217;m interested especially i the question about monasticism.</p>
<p>In fellopwship and in Christ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Bradley</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 05:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>Recently I was mildly reproved, albeit indirectly, for engaging in discussions like those that occur here. Needless to say, I disagree with their analysis. It was seen as useless to &quot;the salvation of our souls&quot;.

My immediate reaction was, &quot;What of the salvation of our minds?!&quot; Though I am a mere over-the-road trucker, my mind needs to know that what I&#039;m recieving from the Orthodox Church is correct and I didn&#039;t just get lucky in my choice of kool-aid.

This is my favorite blog to visit. It&#039;s cool to see Dr. Farrell post now and then. Want to hear a good one? I am 1200 miles from home, yet I have in my truck a copy of &quot;Mystagogy&quot; with an introduction by Dr. Farrell that I got in a used bookstore in Phoenix 8 years ago.  What a hoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I was mildly reproved, albeit indirectly, for engaging in discussions like those that occur here. Needless to say, I disagree with their analysis. It was seen as useless to &#8220;the salvation of our souls&#8221;.</p>
<p>My immediate reaction was, &#8220;What of the salvation of our minds?!&#8221; Though I am a mere over-the-road trucker, my mind needs to know that what I&#8217;m recieving from the Orthodox Church is correct and I didn&#8217;t just get lucky in my choice of kool-aid.</p>
<p>This is my favorite blog to visit. It&#8217;s cool to see Dr. Farrell post now and then. Want to hear a good one? I am 1200 miles from home, yet I have in my truck a copy of &#8220;Mystagogy&#8221; with an introduction by Dr. Farrell that I got in a used bookstore in Phoenix 8 years ago.  What a hoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophocles</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophocles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>Dear Acolyte and Photios,

Please continue what you are doing.  Your voice is needed and this site has helped me many times to return to a center of  our Holy Church.  May the truth of Orthodoxy spread, may our gracious Lord open the eyes of all who have not come to see Her as His Bride.  I really mean it my brothers in Christ.

In fellowship and in Christ, 
Sophocles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Acolyte and Photios,</p>
<p>Please continue what you are doing.  Your voice is needed and this site has helped me many times to return to a center of  our Holy Church.  May the truth of Orthodoxy spread, may our gracious Lord open the eyes of all who have not come to see Her as His Bride.  I really mean it my brothers in Christ.</p>
<p>In fellowship and in Christ,<br />
Sophocles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>Perry,

Fair enough.  Incidently, if you are choosing the additional contributors by popular referendum -- and somehow I doubt that you are :) -- my votes would go to STK and Dr. Tighe respectively.  I have read valuable insights from both of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perry,</p>
<p>Fair enough.  Incidently, if you are choosing the additional contributors by popular referendum &#8212; and somehow I doubt that you are <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8212; my votes would go to STK and Dr. Tighe respectively.  I have read valuable insights from both of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acolyte</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>acolyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Matt,

No and here is why. This is one of the only places I know that discusses what we do. That makes us unique. Once we become like everyone else, there&#039;s no significance to us. Secondly, it is better to do a few things well than many things poorly. We are trying, casually, to do a few things well. At most we will be adding contributors.

This doesn&#039;t mean that we can&#039;t take it to the streets. I firmly believe you can use much of this material in popular apologetics. The trick is coming back down into the cave by using examples, questions and metaphors that the audience can grasp, without sacrificing content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>No and here is why. This is one of the only places I know that discusses what we do. That makes us unique. Once we become like everyone else, there&#8217;s no significance to us. Secondly, it is better to do a few things well than many things poorly. We are trying, casually, to do a few things well. At most we will be adding contributors.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean that we can&#8217;t take it to the streets. I firmly believe you can use much of this material in popular apologetics. The trick is coming back down into the cave by using examples, questions and metaphors that the audience can grasp, without sacrificing content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energeticprocession.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/we-are-legion/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>P+P,

Have you two considered expanding the scope of the blog a bit?  Perhaps you could post some thoughts about how Christians -- and not just not just Orthodox ;) -- should approach those of other religions (Islam, Jewdaism, Mormon, etc.) as well as conversations with atheists and agnostics.  Also, I would be interested in more practical evangelism techniques -- ie What do you discuss with people who aren&#039;t interested in advanced theological conversations about ADS, Monoenergism, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P+P,</p>
<p>Have you two considered expanding the scope of the blog a bit?  Perhaps you could post some thoughts about how Christians &#8212; and not just not just Orthodox <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  &#8212; should approach those of other religions (Islam, Jewdaism, Mormon, etc.) as well as conversations with atheists and agnostics.  Also, I would be interested in more practical evangelism techniques &#8212; ie What do you discuss with people who aren&#8217;t interested in advanced theological conversations about ADS, Monoenergism, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
